

Below is our Newcastle Disease Movement Protocol 2. Should you wish to download the pdf verion please click on the desired links below.
Should you wish to view it on line (english only) click on the link topics below or scroll down.
NAI Surveillance Protocol Edition 1 - September 2005
Notifiable Avian Influenza (NAI) Surveillance protocol for compulsory surveillance in South Africa to prove continued NAI freedom
Edition 1 - September 2005
South Africa could, after the successful country-wide survey, declare itself free from NAI in September 2005. South Africa has to remain vigilant however and all measures have to be taken to reduce the risk of the re-introduction of the infection. Surveillance testing also has to be carried out to confirm the country's disease-free trading status for NAI.
The following protocol has to be followed:
1. Official control:
All testing to be carried out under official control i.e. done by State Veterinarian (SV) or Animal Health Technician (AHT) or designated person as arranged with SV. The SV remains responsible and should at least audit the testing if not done by his/her own staff. Designated persons can be authorized by the National Senior Manager Animal Health (SMAH) to collect official samples under control of the SV.
2. Ongoing testing:
Testing is to be carried out on an ongoing basis with each property tested twice a year (at least). The results, however, are supplied to the SMAH on 1 January and 1 July every year. (State Veterinary officials are advised to not start each cycle of testing a mere 2 weeks before the results are due to be submitted!)
3. Targeted surveillance:
Statistically significant numbers of non-commercial chicken operations because of the risk of exposure to wild birds.
As many large commercial chicken operations as possible because of the large concentration of chickens with a high epidemiological risk profile
All commercial ostrich operations because of their historic risk profile and the 2004 outbreak. Although testing of ostriches has been limited to slaughter birds, as a result of the outcome of the 2005 survey, it remains important to test ostriches from as many farms as possible (i.e. all farms supplying ostriches for slaughter) in order to detect and deal with any possible future outbreak as soon as possible. Additional tests on ostrich breeding and chick raising establishments may be conducted at the discretion of the Provincial Director Veterinary Services (PDVS) according to the perceived possible risk.
4. Reporting
Six-monthly summary reports are to be supplied by the PDVS to the SMAH of the summary of results in the prescribed format (electronic copies for each Province available from Dr Grietjie de Klerk, Sub-Directorate Epidemiology, Directorate Animal Health (DoA)). In addition to this, there must be immediate notification of any suspicious results to the PDVS and SMAH.
Testing procedure:
The sampling strategy is laid out under 'C' with serological testing to be done by one of the three official laboratories. The industries and producers are responsible for the costs of testing all commercial chicken and ostrich operations, while DoA will pay for the testing of samples from non-commercial chicken operations if submitted in the prescribed manner by the State Veterinarian. For the purpose of determining NAI freedom, South Africa has decided to use serological testing for antibodies to H5 and H7 AI subtypes (NAI). Should there be suspicious results, they are to be followed up by additional tests (including PCR) as discussed with the SMAH.
5. Biosecurity:
Surveillance is not a preventative measure on its own and biosecurity is crucial in the risk management of NAI. All surveillance activities at commercial chicken and ostrich operations with large concentrations of animals at risk should thus be used to create awareness and compliance with the relevant biosecurity measures (See Appendix A and A Chickens)
Non-commercial chickens Evidence to be provided by the PDVS about a six-monthly random survey in chickens in his/her Province, conducted in the following manner:
1.1 As many randomly selected epidemiological units as possible should be tested bi- annually (6 monthly) with a minimum of 50 flocks/units per Province. (The number of properties to be sampled may be increased as determined by the SMAH according to epidemiological requirements)
1.2 Method of determining properties to be sampled:
Properties to be selected on a random geographical basis. This includes the identification of a site (point) in random fashion, with sampling carried out on the property with chickens that is closest to the identified site (be it a rural site or a commercial poultry farm).
1.3 Samples to be submitted for H5 and H7 testing to one of the official laboratories as detailed below (point C).
1.4 Costs to be covered by the DoA if samples are received correctly labeled, with full information at the laboratory.
1.5 Full records of sampling dates, sites, laboratory result sheets etc to be kept in the Province for auditing purposes.
1.6 A report to be submitted by PDVS to SMAH at 6 monthly intervals (1 January and 1 July of each year) that should include the following in table format:
Note: The Excel report format that was used in the 2005 survey should be used. Electronic copies of the reporting format is available from Dr Grietjie de Klerk at (012) 319 7412, email: grietjiedk@nda.agric.za
2. Commercial chicken farms
Traceability and bio-security measures have to be of high standard on all large scale commercial chicken farms even if not directly involved in export (Appendix A). A bi-annual (6-monthly) NAI survey also has to be carried out on these farms.
2.1 Bi-annual (6 monthly) survey:
2.2 Records to be submitted by PDVS to SMAH:
Bi-annual summaries of NAI testing to be submitted by the PDVS to the SMAH at six- monthly intervals (1 January and 1 July of each year) that should include the following in table format:
Note: The Excel report format that was used in the 2005 survey should be used. Electronic copies of the reporting format is available from Dr Grietjie de Klerk at (012) 319 7412, email: grietjiedk@nda.agric.za
2.3 Sampling strategy:(See 'C')
B. Ostriches
Traceability and bio-security measures have to be upgraded on all domestic ostrich farms that either supply ostriches for slaughter to export abattoirs or that supply hatching eggs or chicks for this purpose (Appendix B). A bi-annual (6-monthly) NAI survey also has to be carried out on these farms. Evidence has to be provided by the PDVS in the following manner that all such domestic ostrich facilities in the Province are registered for export purposes, practice adequate bio-security and conduct at bi-annual intervals, testing for NAI at one of the official laboratories.
As a result of the 2005 survey, routine testing of ostriches has been limited to slaughter birds that may be tested on the farm or at the abattoir. However, it remains important to test ostriches from as many farms as possible (i.e. all farms supplying ostriches for slaughter) in order to detect and deal with any possible future outbreak as soon as possible. Additional tests on ostrich breeding and chick raising establishments may be conducted at the discretion of the PDVS according to the perceived possible risk.
1. Bi-annual (6 monthly) survey:
2. Records to be submitted by PDVS to National SMAH:
2.1 Bi-annual summaries of NAI testing at all ostrich facilities to be submitted by the PDVS to the SMAH at six-monthly intervals (1 January and 1 July of each year) that should include the following in table format:
Note: The Excel report format that was used in the 2005 survey should be used. Electronic copies of the reporting format is available from Dr Grietjie de Klerk at (012) 319 7412, email: grietjiedk@nda.agric.za
3. Sampling strategy: See point C
C. Sampling Strategy:
1. The sampling strategy for chickens and ostriches is as follows:
All serological testing has to be designed to detect the presence or absence of the exposure of ostriches/chickens to H5 and H7 avian influenza subtypes (NAI) at >10% prevalence with 95% confidence in every epidemiological unit on each farm or site or multi-age unit (age group or management unit); i.e. the number of birds to be tested depends on the size of each group on every farm as follows:
| Size of the Epidemiological group | No. of Ostriches / Chickens to be sampled |
| <10 | 10 |
| <20 | 16 |
| <50 | 22 |
| <100 | 25 |
| <200 | 27 |
| <900 | 28 |
| >900 | 29 |
As a result of the 2005 survey, routine testing of ostriches has been limited to slaughter birds that may be tested on the farm or at the abattoir. However, it remains important to test ostriches from as many farms as possible (i.e. all farms supplying ostriches for slaughter) in order to detect and deal with any possible future outbreak as soon as possible. Additional tests on ostrich breeding and chick raising establishments may be conducted at the discretion of the PDVS according to the perceived possible risk.
For submission forms, please contact the respective laboratory. Please, identify the species, e.g. Ostrich, Chicken, Duck etc. (NOT just 'avian'), and supply full information on all submission forms.
NOTE: OSTRICH SAMPLES FROM FARMS IN THE WESTERN CAPE PROVINCE ARE TO BE SUBMITTED TO THE PVL STELLENBOSCH, WHILE SAMPLES FROM OSTRICH FARMS IN THE REST OF THE COUNTRY ARE TO BE SUBMITTED TO THE ONDERSTEPOORT VETERINARY INSTITUTE.
2. Serology tests to be done:
Serology tests have to be carried out for H5 as well as H7 subtypes Chickens: Haemagglutination Inhibition or commercial ELISA tests (only if chickens not vaccinated with inactivated H6 vaccine).
Ostriches: Haemagglutination Inhibition test
3. In the case of suspicious/positive serological test results, the following procedure applies:
Biosecurity guidelines for all commercial chicken operations irrespective of whether or not export facility
The following minimum biosecurity measures are recommended for chicken farms/establishments:
1. Fencing
2. The chicken houses/production sites should be fenced off, ideally with electric fencing. Access control for visitors, vehicles (feed trucks, visitors):
2.1 A security gate, preferably electric will prevent unauthorized entry to the farm
2.2 The access road to the farm should run as far away from the sites/houses as possible, with dedicated smaller access roads to each site.
2.3 Visitors: Visitors should not be allowed inside the chicken houses, unless they have not had access to poultry for at least the last 3 days or have taken a shower (removal of all clothes and including the washing of hair).
2.4 Feed delivery: - Feed trucks should be cleaned/disinfected at the feed depot and leave directly from the depot to the farm.
3. Dedicated specific sites/buildings
4. Workers
5. Foot baths
Properly administered foot baths should be placed at the entry of all poultry houses. Foot baths should contain disinfectant that is replaced at regular intervals (definitely as soon as dirty) and no entry or exit by workers whilst by-passing the foot bath.
6. Wild birds
There should be NO contact between wild birds and chickens.
7. Houses
should be constructed in such a way that wild birds cannot gain entry NO open water in the vicinity of the chicken houses. This includes open dams, ponds or even furrows Spilt feed should be removed immediately.
8. Rodents
9. Surveillance - (See surveillance protocol)
10. General
It is essential that all chicken farmers liaise closely with their respective SV. Transparency is essential and any outbreak of disease, or suspected outbreak of disease has to, according to the Animal Diseases Act (Act 35 of 1984), be reported to the State Veterinary Services. This will ensure that the presence and nature of the disease is established without delay and necessary measures can be instituted by the veterinary authority to control losses and prevent the potential spread of the disease.
Biosecurity Guidelines for the Ostrich Industry
The outbreak of Highly Pathogenic Notifiable Avian Influenza on ostrich farms in the Eastern and Western Cape Provinces last year has highlighted various aspects of the ostrich industry that are not conducive to efficient disease control. Biosecurity and disease monitoring in particular are an important aspect of disease control that need to be addressed in future to prevent further disease problems, especially avian influenza.
The following applies to all domestic ostrich facilities that supply the export facility (e.g. breeder farms that supply a specific hatchery, grower farms that supply a certain abattoir)
1. Purchase of Ostriches:
Ostriches should only be bought or received onto a farm from previously tested and negative sources. Do not buy any ostrich unless it has been tested negative for avian influenza. Serological testing has to be done at least twice, with an interval of at least 3 weeks and the last test within 2 weeks of movement from the farm of origin.
2. Traceability
A. Registration of all ostrich farms/holdings
It is essential that all ostrich farms/holdings in the country, irrespective of size and whether the ostriches are kept for the export of meat, are registered by the Provincial Veterinary Services. Full GPS details of the location of the farm have to be obtained. The data should also include up-to-date figures on the number and age groups or type of birds on the farm.(Refer to VPN for the export of ratite meat)
B. Proper identification
All ostriches on the farm/holding have to be identified. This is essential to facilitate good record-keeping. A tag that is located under the wing is not the most practical identification method, as it can be read only once the ostrich has been caught and restrained. A tag that is located on the neck is more practical and should be used. All ostriches above the age of 3-4 months have to be tagged, but definitely before any movement occurs. If ostrich chicks at a younger age are to be moved, they have to be tagged at a younger age, prior to movement.
3. Biosecurity
4. Surveillance(See surveillance protocol)
5. General
It is essential that all ostrich farmers liaise closely with their respective State Veterinarian. Transparency is essential and any outbreak of disease, or suspected outbreak of disease has to, according to the Animal Diseases Act (Act 35 of 1984), be reported to the State Veterinary Services. This will ensure that the presence and nature of the disease is established without delay and necessary measures can be instituted by the veterinary authority to control losses and prevent the potential spread of the disease.